The Revelation of the Children of Shunya: A Meditation

Shunya becomes you, as you become Shunya…..

The children of Shunya are not quantities, in the final analysis they are states of mind for our interaction with Shunya; they are experiences of the various magnitudes that are Shunya with regard to how specifically we interact with them as a proportion space.

We do not proportion Shunya, it proportions all of itself, constantly changing in any specified region . As Sons and daughters and animates of Shunya we are proportioned too, but we also proportion. We are fractally entrained to Shunya.mwhat Shunya does we may also do in our own choosing and in our own scale . Beyond our scale we can not do what shunya does,mbut we can apprehend it. And way beyond that is the limit of our ability to apprehend and comprehend all the changes and relations within Shunya.

I wanted to verify the crucial nature of the ratio of arc to the lengths on the diameter, to find out if we as cultures really apprehended it.mto do ths I analysed the issue of finding the length of the periphery of a circle. Mostly we do not analyse this, we are directed to the area instead. The reason is because the circumference or periphery is one of the oldest and most problematic measurements we can make. The issue is what metron to usefully use.

Since measurement began arc has been the most important measure. Everything is measured in terms of arc. And yet how is it defined? It really is inseparable from the dimensions of a sphere, but often it is measured wit any shape that holds a rigid distinction. Arc is a measure of relative positions of things in space from a fixed position. It is the fixed objects that establish a network of orientations that we have eventually tied to a circular disc or some rigid body by marking off orientations as lines in that fixed rigid body. The sectors formed when crossed by a circle cut out arcs in the circles periphery, but they do the same for any shape of boundary. Closed boundaries are particularly favoured for this, and therefore arcs are not necessarily parts of circles.

We fractalise these arcs and measure with them, but we become so familiar with them we forget what a unique magnitude they are! Because we are on the ground and cannot actually measure distances in the heavens, we have to use relations of similarity, proportion, and congruency to calculate distances we cannot reach. The proportion or ratio of a circle or curve to a straight line, even a diameter has it's intrinsic difficulty: they are not proportioning identical magnitudes!
Thus we skip the problem, conjunct them together and then define them as a new unit. When the combination falls apart, we still have the initial problem of how they magnitudes relate.
Because an object curves it has a attribute called curvature,mthisvwas actually twists space so one side is different to the other side of any boundary in twisted space. And this curvature attribute never disappears until the curved space itself disappears. This is Newtons insight. Thus for curved space we need to wanting it by bounds. In the plane Newton used an upper and lower bound. His Lammas develop on this, but of course we must no forget the tightest bound, the restriction to an essential plane! Therefore in free space we have to use a bound that limits in all orientations, and for that purpose the sphere or ball is ideal. But a sphere is curved itself! And so we must finally recognise that the general distinction in space is not straightness but curvature. All relationships are related through curvature not straightness.

Many want to blame Euclid for his emphasis of this most special of cases, but they cannot do so because Euclid never taught geometry, he taught philosophy, and using the mind to reason dualist ally. Thus some of us need to move on and finish his course rather than carp!.

Euclid by Plato moves us from the special case to the general case of the sphere and then beyond. From the outset his goal was and is the sphere. The very attributes of proportionality,similarity and ratio are defined in the sphere amongst so much we take as wrongly unique to the plane. But Euclid considered curvature even in the plane in relation to the circle and tangent. No fundamental property was not examined. The use of the resulting theorems was not always apparent.

In accommodating to 3 d space many analogues to neighbourhoods and particularly tangents are required. The CGI industry has driven much research into these areas, so now we have vowels to analogue pixels and cones to analogue convergence of vectors in space. We definitely require tangent cylinders to deal with orbital motion, or even aeroplane flight where pitch yaw and roll are important magnitudes in flight motion. All of these quantities are essential in the space, what Newton called nascent or evanescence. They exist in the interaction surfaces of adjacent space in dynamic relative motion. And therefore they are relativistic motion equilibrium effects.

In our Cartesian reference frames we have no notion of inherent spatial attributes. All that changed with the ideas of Grassmann, and the discoveries of Hamilton. The reference frame itself contributed to the motions and forces in space! Both these gentlemen fully acknowledged the influence of Lagrange in this. But it was Hamilton who discovered the role of the children of Shunya in effecting this. Until Hamilton's Quaternions there was no real application of the imaginaries in space or physics. It was Hamilton, who believed in the imaginaries, who went on to develop the mathesis of the imaginaries who realised that Cotes and De Moivre had opened the door to the true nature of space! But it required his combining the imaginaries into a reference frame called the quaternions to really demonstrate that.

Many did not like them, including Lewis Carol, and even today they have to be defended, due to misrepresentation as unreal, tricksy, sleight of hand mathematics, when in fact they are the foundational distinctions of our capacity to measure and interact with space. They are not quantities, they are quantifiable magnitudes and the magnitudes are experienced in relation to Shunya, that is everything.

Let us meditate:

Shunya is everything, it is identical to every thing.
Perception focus occurs within a perception landscape. A perception landscape is a proportioned landscape, as I experience it, and I experience a perception focus within a proportion landscape. I perceive both the proportion landscape and the perception focus within the one experience, disposing the perception focus to the fore and the proportion landscape, everything else that is Shunya to the background, the aft; the rear.

This is how I interact with space. My mental process is perceiving in a proportion landscape. My perception focus disposes a focus region, a space of intense perceptive activity focus, a region of intensified perceptual activity; my mental process brings this region toward me spatially while Shunya defocusses and moves smoothly into the background. No thing disappears, all things are perceived relative to me and disposed in spatial consciousness relative to the region of perception focus.
Shunya is everything, but I perceive every thing relative to Shunya in the background and my perception focus region in the fore.
This is how I mentally interact with Shunya: foreground/ background, high intensity/ low intensity, sharp region of perception focus/ diffuse region of perception defocus, detail/lack of detail, bounded region / unbounded region,. And this is not just in the visual senses, but also in every other sensory network. The auditor mesh , the skin mesh sensations , the taste/smell sensations all follow this pattern in mentally processing Shunya.
Shunya is everything, but these patterns are the children of Shuna, by which I perceive everything.

The subjective process centre interacts with Shunya through the sensors, the chief proceeding network being the proprioceptive sensory mesh. This unconsciously provides the operating system, the operating platform into which every other sensory mesh fits and contributes to the overall whole subjective experience of Shunya .

The subjective process moves unfathomably between conscious and unconscious processing, in a background processing of Shunya. The levels at which I acknowledge conscious apprehension are high , very high up in a ladder of data processing.

Thus my experience of interacting with Shunya is one of pulling regions into the foreground, jostling others into the background. Background/foreground: my mental processing and perception Response is encoded in these terms.

Against a background of Shunya things are pulled into, or out of focus, and it is process of comparing regions that underpins the processes of comparison, measurement and distinction. It is this focusing and defocusing against the background of Shunya that I call mental manipulation. And it is rightly called for it analogues physical manipulations of objects and regions of space or objects. But it is the mental manipulation that underpins the physical, grounding it .

Thus let my analyses reflect this mental and physical manipulation. May all my Analyses be dual, acknowledging both the totality in Shunya, and the singularity inside my mental process.let me always be aware that my thoughts are conjugates with external referrents, and all external spaces and events are conjugated with internal representations.

When I apprehend the space around me, let me know clearly that it is a singular focus pulled out from a multiple panoramic view. May I comprehend that my focus region defines my view of Shunya.

My focus region impacts on my view, my experience of Shunya, Shunya is thus factorised by the scale of my focus region . Thus the focus region itself both analyses and factorised Shunya into focus region sized "chunks" of data, it also synthesise through my mental processing, Shunya as a multiple form of these sized chunks! This very act of focusing is the definition of conjugating. Conjugating a form is dividing it into its essential factors

The factorisation of Shunya depends on ones region of focus, and it's size. One can expand ones focus region to include all of Shunya, thus facto rising nothing into the background, or one can shrink ones focuss region to quantum size, thus factorising most of Shunya into the background. Whatever the chosen size and subject of focus, the synthesis is the conjuncting of the two regions. The two regions are conjugates, they are factors of the totality Shunya.

Suppose now I have a form, and I analyse that form until I find a common measure for all it's parts discoverd on the way down to this small common measure. My focus is this common measure, the conjugate of this common measure is the entire form. And then beyond that the entirety of Shunya!

I notate this as a conjuncted form, a form of factors conjuncted together: a factorisation form, a product form.
For if a form contains 6 of these common measures then the conjunction is (1)(6).

But then I see the same form can be conjuncted (2)(3), and then also (6)(1). As my focus region expand. So the conjugate alters. Of course, in a finite form the conjugate appears to reduce, but in Shunya it recedes further and further into the distant background.

Thus the factors of all specific factorisations are conjugates.
Let us meditate further …..

The conjugation of a conjugate is achieved by a shift of the region of focus to the conjugate of the initial focus region. Thus the conjugates(the focus region and it's conjugate defocusses exterior) are related by a logical not relation. This makes the focus region the fundamental structural element of Shunya as I interact with Shunya.

I conjugate. Shunya merely changes in a complex sequential way.
I conjugate conjugates, my mental processing system compares and denotes the distinctions visually, auditorilly or in general sensor illy. My processing centre denotes in real time in real space, where the distinctions will be of greatest use for my survival. This process of denoting distinctions and disposing them in my experiential continuum I define as adjugation

Adjugation is the process of forming adjugates spatially disposed in relevant positions.
The process of forming adjugates is the process of conjugating a conjugate structure by varying the focus region, and noting the contrasts and distinctions by a comparative process, and then further denoting the distinctions in experiential space in real time.

We have augmented reality systems that do this. For example googles Glass" project.. Thus we see that to adjugate is to augment the perceptionscape, the proportion landscape, with "mark up" coding which provides specific detailed supportive information in that region, when it becomes the focus region.

We understand this kind of system in the HTML,XML codes we use in document texts. The XML code is adjugate to specific parts and items in the text document. The text file itself is conjugate with Shunya.
However by adjugation this conjugate structure is enhanced into distinct regions, giving the conjugate basis a familiar "aggregate" structure. This is an aggregation of adjugates

My subjective processing then, is factorised by conjugation, and then conjugates the conjugate to develop adjugate regional information within the conjugate structure.

Within the focus region, therefore we tend to aggregate the associated adjugates. These processes of adjugate aggregation underpin all our algebraic constructions and manipulations, but going unnoticed is the continual basis process of conjugation to form the distinctions.

I start with factorisation, I continue with algebraisation, and all is based on comparing and contrasting focus regions against Shunya as the backdrop, and denoting the distinctions in a real time mark up language that augments reality.

Conjugate regions are paired by a logical not relation, adjugates are distinguished by a logical intersection process of the conjugate structure of Shunya the compared areas are marked as change/nochange distinctions, themselves logical conjugates to each other….in some alternative sense sub factors of the Shunya conjugate structure by "logical not" relativity.

Just as the fundamental structure is a synthesis of conjugates arranged in a conjuncted product form, the fundamental structure is also an aggregation structure of adjugates arranged as piecemeal conglomerates of distinctions and contrasts, differences and differentials.
I have a dual description of the structure of Shunya, one is a conjugate structure of boundary separated regions, a mental and logical multipleform, the other is an aggregate structure of differentials.

The mental process of conjugation, logically divides a totality into similar and proportioned regions.mthis is so that what is done in the focus region can be efficiently scaled to the whole of Shunya. What this means is I am predisposed to scale up and down. I am predisposed to make my focus region a scale model of the whole of Shunya.Therefore I am predisposed to develop similar forms at different scales, and to particularly note this phenomenon.

Because of this, the natural and fundamental process paradigms for synthesis and analysis should be fractal and iterative.

The Children of Shunya are found by analysing the notion of unity. The notion of unity or a unit is the fundament of measurement and counting and rhythmical motion and poetry. But that the closed curve, and in particular the circle should define them is an astonishing admission of my own circular apprehensions. Of all the forms in my experience the spiral and the sphere speak of the fundamental motion in Shunya, the perpetual change. And in the sphere the most magical confluence of all spiralling curves occurs. The sphere is no less dynamic than the spirals that form it.

The perfection of the sphere is its perfect dynamism. In this the children of Shunya have their foundation , and by it I have my dynamic focus regions, and my experiences of conjugation and adjugation, factorisation and aggregation, logarithms and trigonomrtrists, proportional itis and similarities, logics and all manner of other relations.
The factors of Shunya are 2, they are not dual. They are conjugate, we start with conjugacy, we extend to adjugacy and then we begin to count and name duality and every other distinction.
Shunya is everything, and everything comes from Shunya, and returns to Shunya.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s